A conversation about publishing would by nature always include a conversation about creating best sellers. As I understand, according to a great book called Book Business by industry icon Jason Epstein, publishing houses often take a bath on a major name or title as a way to boost the brand, making the bulk of income on the backlist and “smaller” titles. Two experiences come to mind: One, when I ran a small advertising business at startup we gave free ads to major names and it made our client list look great to have Outback Steakhouse and Dunkin Donuts on there. The dirty little secret was we didn’t charge them, at first. But we did get something of great value! And two, a registrar with a foundation I knew told me the great bulk of the moolah they gathered came from the ton of small donations from ordinary guys like me, and the big donors were sensational and encouraged others to give, but were actually a smaller part of the funding, albeit a vital part of the overall program.
But a small publishing house will need something sexy if it’s to get attention, I suppose, if one’s goal as a publisher is to sell the imprint. That’s not really the vision at Bimini just yet, in fact the vision is to watch talented authors grow and build platforms. Probably because Bimini sprouted from the seeds of writers first, publishers second. And I’m not in any way disparaging publishers! I am one! Kind of analogous to all the hooplah baseball players get in “the show” (the pros) and the slightly lessor known roles the support folk play, like coaches, managers, owners. If you’re in an industry you love doing something you love…
And the whole science of making best sellers comes down, really, to concentrating sales at launch. Heck, that’s why we have launches! Amazon lists are one thing but the New York Times and others are another. Amazon has lots of categories (hundreds) and the more major lists that are Neilson fed with data normally have only a few dozen. It can take apparently something like 5,000 sales in a week to spike up into a best seller list and as a result, get all the attendant attention that comes with that, and then feeds into more sales!
So it’s fascinating to watch it happen. Why don’t authors just quietly release books in the middle of the night, knowing their fans will get to it in the near future? Because of those algorithms, of course. And they snowball. It’s the art and science of publishing economics, which feeds publishers and writers alike, and makes names and so on. Most recently–very recently, like in these last few days–there’s a really amazing example. Whether you have a platform or not, you can help your book’s chances by connecting with someone who does. Well, Rand Paul, in the fresh, hot start of the political season, announced there would be news in the next few weeks that would take Hillary down, and that was about all he could say. Talk about a mystery! The news channels went pretty wild with it. Then it was announced that a new book was coming out, Clinton Cash by Peter Schweizer, that would show connections between large donations and Hillary’s choices as SOS. The tantalizing news was enough to capture anyone’s interest (unless perhaps if you’re a big Hillary fan, in which case you feel ire and/or wince), and I really don’t mean to get political here. In fact I bring it up simply because of the raw power of the sequence of events for the book!
Of course, there’s a release date announced (May 5th, 2015), and the book is available for pre-order on Amazon, who is already touting the tome as a #1 Bestseller, before it’s been released.
What can we learn from this? What if we, too, would like to have a bestseller? (1) Concentrate sales during a pre-announced launch week, and go wild creating mystery, attention, anticipation, and pre-sales leading up to that. The rest is tactics. If you have a base there are things you can do with them, and if you don’t have a base you can start building one at last off of the announced upcoming release. You can also start aligning with those who do have a base for some cross-pollination (I’m sorry, I love that term even more than “synergy”), and Rand Paul the week after he scolds two reporters isn’t bad, as an example, depending on your target audience of course.
Whether or not there is such a thing as “bad press” you will have to decide, and decide according to your brand and genre. There are plenty of examples of news stories where a cynic might attribute the occurrence to a lust for attention. Personally, I think it’s proportional in terms of risk and rewards. Anyone can and should build a base bit by bit, and not neglect to use books, your back list as well as news of new releases, to build it from. Big cannon publicity is a cost/benefit decision, and controversy and notoriety simply riskier, depending on your brand and your hoped for direction.
Personally, I would like to build more of a brand (of course) as a writer, so I’m deciding on a public figure to bio at present, and there are a few who I would have access to in ways, who are of great interest to me, and who would bring larger platforms for their stories. And let’s not neglect who have worthy stories to tell!